|
Post by Lisa-Marie on Aug 6, 2005 22:17:49 GMT
no hunny this was on the 28/07 (see 1st post date)
Sounded good tho x
|
|
|
Post by Trixie on Aug 6, 2005 22:18:10 GMT
|
|
|
Post by angel2 on Aug 7, 2005 15:51:38 GMT
no hun, it was on a couple of weeks back.
|
|
|
Post by strauss on Aug 14, 2005 9:31:24 GMT
Morning everyone, I know it was a few weeks ago now but after Yvette appeared on the Wright stuff i remember reading a thread on the Living forum that Yvette has said she wanted to have another baby, as i missed the show i wondered if she really did say that or whether it was another rumour on the living forum. Thank you strauss xx
|
|
|
Post by Jacks on Aug 14, 2005 12:38:03 GMT
Morning Strauss
Actually, it was the complete opposite. I watched the show and she categorically stated that she did NOT want another baby.
Just another MH Forum rumour...arse about face again...lol
|
|
|
Post by strauss on Aug 14, 2005 18:43:29 GMT
Ok thanks for that Jackie.
|
|
|
Post by joeypesci on Aug 15, 2005 13:24:04 GMT
The drunk? hmmmm....I think I could hazard a guess...lol It was nice to see her laughing and I really hope Matthew Wright agrees to go on a Most Haunted shoot. I think it would be quite funny! I don't as then David will ham it up like he did when the Radio 1 crew went. Your no doubt get more activity to if he goes. Can't very well have someone who will debunk there and then nothing happen. So no doubt someone will be banging on a floor somewhere. In my eyes it was the worst mistake ever, getting so called 'Celebs' to appear on the show. It lost all credibility when they started doing that. Especially having Uri on there. And yes, I believe its obvious she was talking about Derek, maybe. BUT love him or hate him, if he has a drinking problem thats HIS business. I personally ain't a fan of the guy. But I think that was REALLY rude of Yvette to come out with comments like that. Yes it might not of been him, but whoever it is. Why did she feel the need to air this on national tv where millions of people will be watching. You have a problem with someone you either keep quite and keep out of there way, or you speak to them directly. You don't talk behind there back to millions of TV viewers. In my eyes that was just being, just that little bit bitchy. EDIT- And to the person that said "I hope he does do a shoot with them, that will shut him up". So does this imply that something WILL happen, could this then imply that the crew do fake things when a celeb is on the show. Could it not be possible that NOTHING will happen or that with all the noises and bangs he'll have the logical theory that this is pipes and wood work expanding and contracting. Would David ham it up again like he did when Radio 1 was there? I really wish I was on the shoot with the Radio 1 crew. There was no evidence at all, yet they still looked scare. David's "Get Out", in my eyes, was a ploy to scare the Radio 1 crew and I would have dismissed and ignore anything David came out with. I would show him respect of course, but if he comes out with anything then I'd just take it with a pintch of salt. And if he or Derek did the classic "Its an evil one this. Don't make it angre, it wants us to leave. I think we should.". Erm, nope. I'm staying put. I'm here to investigate, thats what I'm doing. The spirit is DEAD. It has no right anymore to order anyone to 'Get Out'. All I'll say to it is At least then if it does anything it will be on camera.
|
|
|
Post by Lisa-Marie on Aug 15, 2005 13:30:01 GMT
I have to say I agree with joey... Looking back, its probably was'nt the best thing to say on Live Tv, altho we don't really know what goes on behind closed doors with all of them... but even tho.... it was a bit below the belt.... however in her defence she did'nt ATCHALLY say Derek's name.... we have just assumed it is !
|
|
|
Post by joeypesci on Aug 15, 2005 13:32:14 GMT
I have to say I agree with joey... Looking back, its probably was'nt the best thing to say on Live Tv, altho we don't really know what goes on behind closed doors with all of them... but even tho.... it was a bit below the belt.... however in her defence she did'nt ATCHALLY say Derek's name.... we have just assumed it is ! Yes but the point is, whoever she was talking about, it STILL was WAY below the belt. I personally, wouldn't want to be any friend of hers if she's like that.
|
|
|
Post by Lisa-Marie on Aug 15, 2005 13:45:30 GMT
I do think it was an unnecessary comment to make about anyone, derek or otherwize.
But to be fair, there are two ways of looking at the comment she made.... she was either saying it to be deliberately malicious ... or she was just genuinely keeping on topic and pointing just out that she could relate to the topic at hand..
I would be interested to know, which of the two u think it was Joey ?
|
|
|
Post by joeypesci on Aug 15, 2005 13:55:13 GMT
I do think it was an unnecessary comment to make about anyone, derek or otherwize. But to be fair, there are two ways of looking at the comment she made.... she was either saying it to be deliberately malicious ... or she was just genuinely keeping on topic and pointing just out that she could relate to the topic at hand.. I would be interested to know, which of the two u think it was Joey ? Not sure, but which ever one, unless she was talking about herself then she has no right to talk about someone else behind their back like that, on national Live TV.
|
|
|
Post by littlemisslucky on Aug 15, 2005 20:37:23 GMT
I think she should have been less specific and Matthew should not have made the comment afterwards. Cant do much about it now though it was a live show.
|
|
|
Post by angel2 on Aug 15, 2005 21:54:01 GMT
the thing is NO names were mentioned so why slate yvette ? she could of been talking about joe bloggs next door for all we know ! she was involved in a discussion about alcholism, and was replying to this. Matthew wright in my opinion is a bit of a stirrer anyway and he likes to make good tv ( john leslie comments spring to mind lol), so i say that leave yvette alone !!
|
|
|
Post by emmarudd on Aug 15, 2005 21:56:37 GMT
yippee well said angel2!!! emma x
|
|
littleangel
New Member
give someone a smile today
Posts: 338
|
Post by littleangel on Aug 15, 2005 21:59:20 GMT
i agree with you there angel hunnie she didnt mention any names, so there is no need to slate the poor love. xx
|
|